Leadership and Teamwork Lessons from Ancient Rome: Insights for Modern Business Teams
The Roman Empire remains one of history's most influential civilisations, renowned for its expansive conquests, sophisticated infrastructure, and enduring governance.
However, its rise and eventual fall offer timeless lessons in leadership and teamwork—insights that resonate in today's business environment. Sabre’s business game, When in Rome, creatively captures these lessons, enabling teams to explore the principles that shaped (and sometimes broke) one of history's greatest empires.
Key Lessons from Rome’s Rise
Clear Communication and Strategic Vision
The Roman military thrived on well-defined strategies and clear communication. Leaders like Julius Caesar inspired loyalty by providing a strong sense of direction, ensuring that every soldier understood their role in achieving victory. In modern business, leaders who communicate a compelling vision and empower teams with clarity are more likely to succeed.
Sabre’s When in Rome reinforces this lesson through collaborative decision-making and scenario challenges, pushing teams to align their strategies and communicate effectively to achieve shared goals.
Adaptability and Innovation
Rome's engineering marvels, including aqueducts and roads, exemplify its adaptability and commitment to innovation. Similarly, its military adapted tactics based on the enemy and terrain. Successful business teams thrive when they are flexible and open to adopting new approaches in rapidly changing environments.
The game offers scenarios where teams must think on their feet, adapt their approaches, and solve complex challenges collaboratively.
Building a Strong, Diverse Team
The Roman Empire's strength lay in its ability to integrate diverse cultures and talents from conquered territories. When teams embrace diversity and inclusion, they unlock creativity and resilience. Encouraging collaboration across departments and backgrounds boosts problem-solving and fosters innovation.
When in Rome reinforces this principle by creating scenarios where diversity of team roles and thought lead to better outcomes.
Lessons from Rome’s Fall
Poor Leadership and Internal Conflict
As Rome expanded, poor leadership and infighting became rampant. Ineffective leaders who prioritised personal gain over the empire's collective well-being weakened its foundation. Business organisations similarly falter when leadership lacks integrity or when internal competition overrides cooperation.
The game underscores the consequences of fragmented leadership, offering participants valuable lessons in fostering unity.
Resistance to Change
The inability to adapt to new external threats and evolving social dynamics contributed to Rome's decline. Stagnant organisations that resist innovation face a similar fate. Successful teams remain agile and open to change.
Playing When in Rome challenges teams to rethink traditional approaches and embrace new ideas to stay competitive as change occurs in the flow of the game.
When in Rome gives teams the unique opportunity to explore these timeless lessons in an engaging and playful environment. By learning from Rome’s triumphs and failures, teams can build a foundation for long-term success.
Best 3 Roman Emperors for Leadership Traits
1. Augustus (27 BC - AD 14)
Traits: Visionary, strategic planner, and effective communicator
Key Contributions: Founded the Roman Empire and established a long era of peace (Pax Romana). His reforms in governance, military, and infrastructure set the foundation for stability.
2. Trajan (AD 98 - 117)
Traits: Inclusive leader, military strategist, and innovator
Key Contributions: Expanded the empire to its greatest territorial extent and was admired for his care for the welfare of Roman citizens, including extensive public works.
3. Marcus Aurelius (AD 161 - 180)
Traits: Philosophical, ethical, and compassionate leader
Key Contributions: Known as the "Philosopher King," he upheld justice and stability during challenging times, embodying Stoic principles even during military conflicts.
Worst 3 Roman Emperors for Leadership Failures
1. Caligula (AD 37 - 41)
Traits: Erratic, self-absorbed, and unstable
Key Failings: Infamous for his cruelty, extravagance, and erratic decision-making, he alienated both the Senate and the Roman populace, contributing to widespread instability.
2. Nero (AD 54 - 68)
Traits: Tyrannical, impulsive, and egotistical
Key Failings: His leadership was marred by persecution, financial mismanagement, and neglect of key governance responsibilities, culminating in a massive revolt and his eventual downfall.
3. Commodus (AD 180 - 192)
Traits: Reckless, self-indulgent, and corrupt
Key Failings: His obsession with personal glory led to widespread corruption and weakened Rome’s political stability. His reign marked the beginning of Rome's gradual decline.
Comments