The use of evidence-based tools helps to make team building far more than just a forgettable one-off event.
The term team building gets thrown around quite a lot, usually to describe one-off events. The problem with this is that one-offs may be useful as part of an overall strategy, but don’t equate to an actual team building process in and of themselves.
High-performing teams aren’t just about having talented individuals; they are very much about creating a team dynamic that leverages the strengths and minimizes the weaknesses of its members.
To achieve this, evidence-based tools for team building can provide structure, insight, and measurable results far beyond any one-off team building event. Tools abound, and most are expensive and overly complex, so among these tools, the Belbin Model stands out as one of the most powerful and yet cost-effective for fostering quality teamwork and collaboration.
Why Evidence-Based Tools Matter
Using evidence-based tools for team building ensures that working relationships, approaches to any task and overarching strategies are not based on guesswork or anecdotal success stories. They help to develop teams with tested principles that have proven outcomes.
These tools provide data-driven approaches to understanding how teams function and what makes them successful. This evidence helps in identifying key factors like preferred team behaviours and roles, communication styles, conflict resolution strategies, and the distribution of responsibilities, all of which are critical for building a cohesive team.
Without the support of proven methodologies, team-building exercises can feel arbitrary and far less impactful. Often, organisations that rely on ad-hoc team-building sessions may see short-term morale boosts but miss out on real long-term performance gains that could be obtained. Evidence-based tools provide the framework necessary for sustainable team development.
Adding an evidence-based tool makes sure that on any team building 'event' people are linking behavioural insights to real-world workplace follow though. The tools they are equipped with at any event or workshop can actually be used back at work ongoing.
The Belbin Model: A Standout Approach
Among the many tools available for team building, the Belbin Model offers a unique, evidence-based approach that focuses on identifying the specific roles individuals play within a team.
Developed by Dr. Meredith Belbin and his research team from original big data, this model measures individual preferences across nine behavioural team roles based on their strengths and weaknesses. We all have preferred, manageable and least preferred roles within a team.
The Belbin Model works well because it is approachable, adaptable and yet genuinely rooted in extensive research.
Rather than focusing on individual personality traits alone, the Belbin Model considers how people’s behaviours influence team dynamics. By understanding which roles are present or missing, team members and leaders can better distribute tasks, foster collaboration, and mitigate potential conflicts.
The tool can be easily introduced at the off-site or workshop and be used ongoing back at work.
The Benefits of Using Belbin
One of the most powerful aspects of the Belbin Model is its ability to help create balanced teams. Teams that can tap into a mix of complementary roles are more likely to work efficiently, communicate effectively, and solve problems creatively. Moreover, it encourages self-awareness and personal development among team members, as they begin to understand their natural role preferences and how they can contribute more effectively.
In over 35 years of working in this field we see that building always works best when grounded in evidence-based tools, and the Belbin Model stands out as one of the most practical and insightful.
By using it, teams can achieve sustainable performance improvements, greater cohesion, and a more balanced approach to collaboration back at work long after the buzz has gone from the latest off-site.
TO FIND OUT MORE CONTACT US:
T – 1300731 381
Comments